Need a recommendation for a solar tracking controller to run a couple of linear actuators. Need a brand that actually works. Got one from WindyNation and it works but not very well.
Looking for a solar tracker controller
Collapse
X
-
-
-
Comment
-
There are lots of them on eBay. I have no hands on experience with them though.2.2kw Suntech mono, Classic 200, NEW Trace SW4024Comment
-
That's why many have abandoned trackers and use fixed arrays, sometimes split in 2 directionsPowerfab top of pole PV mount (2) | Listeroid 6/1 w/st5 gen head | XW6048 inverter/chgr | Iota 48V/15A charger | Morningstar 60A MPPT | 48V, 800A NiFe Battery (in series)| 15, Evergreen 205w "12V" PV array on pole | Midnight ePanel | Grundfos 10 SO5-9 with 3 wire Franklin Electric motor (1/2hp 240V 1ph ) on a timer for 3 hr noontime run - Runs off PV ||
|| Midnight Classic 200 | 10, Evergreen 200w in a 160VOC array ||
|| VEC1093 12V Charger | Maha C401 aa/aaa Charger | SureSine | Sunsaver MPPT 15A
solar: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-Solar
gen: http://tinyurl.com/LMR-ListerComment
-
For most applications and orientations without those constraints, a single (optimal) orientation will produce more electricity per (say, a day) time period than will multiple orientations of the same total area.
Longer generation periods/day do not automatically translate to more energy collected per day. Nor are multiple arrays more cost effective than one single array of the same total area - usually and commonly, often the opposite.
Multiple axis tracking needs very careful consideration and analysis from all considerations of engineering, cost, PITA factor and other things. As mentioned/usually the case, increasing the size of an (optimally oriented) array is often/usually more cost effective and a more practical option than a tracking array.Last edited by J.P.M.; 09-14-2018, 01:35 PM.Comment
-
Seems like there is no love for trackers. With the amount of output increase from a tracker, I find that confusing?Comment
-
the tracker, when its clear. It works by trading the machinery and maintenance of a tracker, for more cheap
panels. Bruce RoeComment
-
Comment
-
Unfortunately the price and maintenance of a tracking system is far more costly then just adding 15% more panel wattage.
Utilities seem to be able to justify tracking systems but IMO I think they just push out the additional cost to their customers.Comment
-
Looking at some quotes from installers, I can understand why. I guess it only makes sense for DIY people.Comment
-
The usual bottom line: The tracking array is smaller, but the cost /delivered kWh is probably equal to or higher than the fixed array as are the likely maint. costs. All that is before the real and likely PITA factor of more maintenance hassles.
Pay your money, take your choice, but know that the devil is in the details. Do your homework before you cement an opinion or a decision.Comment
-
Part of the issue is latitude. On the equator a long shaft parallel to the ground can turn a bunch of panels.
If you come here at 42 degrees, it is not practical to tilt a long shaft up that far. So the commercial arrays
leave it flat, but add 30% more panels to compensate for the cosine of 42 degrees. Already a lot of the
apparent tracking advantage is going away. Build lots of tilted short shafts with drives, cost gets out of
control and you need a lot of land to avoid shadowing.
My array puts out 20 hp 8 hours a day. Try building something that size on up to industrial, to see just
what the challenges are. One thing the tracker CAN do, is throw off the snow. Mine is still small enough
to allow doing snow removal by hand, with an arrangement optimized for this. Bruce RoeLast edited by bcroe; 09-15-2018, 01:50 PM.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
Comment